linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V13 0/5] Generate device tree node for pci devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQGaSr+G5qu/8nJZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:17:30 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, max.zhen@....com,
        sonal.santan@....com, stefano.stabellini@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 0/5] Generate device tree node for pci devices

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:12:04PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:19:55AM -0700, Lizhi Hou wrote:

...

> > Can you point out to the ACPI excerpt(s) of the description of anything related
> > to the device(s) in question?
> 
> I don't understand what you are asking for.

Through the email thread it was mentioned that this series was tested on the
ACPI enabled platform, Jonathan (IIRC) asked why do we need to have a shadow
DT for the something that ACPI already describes. That's why I'm trying to
understand if it's the case. and if so, how can we improve the approach.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko