linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: bq24257_charger: Make chip type and name in sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:23:39 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.au@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: bq24257_charger: Make chip type and
 name in sync

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:49:25PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:15:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 07:10:06AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Hi Andy Shevchenko,
> > > > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:33:30PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:

...

> > > > Do we still need acpi.h after this change?
> > > 
> > > Yes, it is still needed as it is using 
> > > ACPI_PTR.
> > 
> > Can we, please, drop ACPI_PTR() as it's more harmful than useful (same way as
> > you dropped the ifdeffery for OF cases in other patches)?
> 
> I will go ahead and merge this series, ACPI_PTR() and
> of_match_ptr() should be removed in a separate cleanup patch.

Sure, that's exactly what I expects to happen.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko