linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] mm, oom: Introduce bpf_oom_evaluate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 19:24:03 +0800
From:   Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...o.com>
To:     Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wuyun.abel@...edance.com, robin.lu@...edance.com,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] mm, oom: Introduce bpf_oom_evaluate_task



在 2023/8/10 16:13, Chuyi Zhou 写道:
> + +__weak noinline int bpf_oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, 
> struct oom_control *oc) +{ + return NO_BPF_POLICY; +} + 
> +BTF_SET8_START(oom_bpf_fmodret_ids) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, 
> bpf_oom_evaluate_task) +BTF_SET8_END(oom_bpf_fmodret_ids)
I have a question here, why use __weak? Is there other modules that can 
redefine bpf_oom_evaluate_task? why not use __bpf_kfunc 
(Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst) ?

Thanks
Bixuan Cui