lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <137fd54d-7d2d-4d0b-a50b-cca69875a814@arinc9.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:35:11 +0300
From:   Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: document internal MDIO bus

On 13.09.2023 14:04, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I don't think they're for switch ports only. Any driver which uses
> phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() or its derivatives gets subject to the same
> bindings. But putting the sub-schema in ethernet-controller.yaml makes
> sense, just maybe not naming it "phylink-switch".

Got it. Should we disallow managed altogether when fixed-link is also
defined, or just with in-band-status value?

Currently:

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
index 9f6a5ccbcefe..3b5946a4be34 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
@@ -284,6 +284,21 @@ allOf:
              controllers that have configurable TX internal delays. If this
              property is present then the MAC applies the TX delay.
  
+$defs:
+  phylink:
+    description: phylink bindings for ethernet controllers
+    allOf:
+      - anyOf:
+          - required: [ fixed-link ]
+          - required: [ phy-handle ]
+          - required: [ managed ]
+
+      - if:
+          required: [ fixed-link ]
+        then:
+          properties:
+            managed: false
+
  additionalProperties: true
  
  ...

Arınç

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ