[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230913113828.18421-4-jgross@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:38:28 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: allow nesting of same lazy mode
When running as a paravirtualized guest under Xen, Linux is using
"lazy mode" for issuing hypercalls which don't need to take immediate
effect in order to improve performance (examples are e.g. multiple
PTE changes).
There are two different lazy modes defined: MMU and CPU lazy mode.
Today it is not possible to nest multiple lazy mode sections, even if
they are of the same kind. A recent change in memory management added
nesting of MMU lazy mode sections, resulting in a regression when
running as Xen PV guest.
Technically there is no reason why nesting of multiple sections of the
same kind of lazy mode shouldn't be allowed. So add support for that
for fixing the regression.
Fixes: bcc6cc832573 ("mm: add default definition of set_ptes()")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
index ed05ce3df5c7..7048dfacc04b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
@@ -72,10 +72,18 @@ enum xen_lazy_mode {
};
DECLARE_PER_CPU(enum xen_lazy_mode, xen_lazy_mode);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, xen_lazy_nesting);
static inline void enter_lazy(enum xen_lazy_mode mode)
{
- BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(xen_lazy_mode) != XEN_LAZY_NONE);
+ enum xen_lazy_mode old_mode = this_cpu_read(xen_lazy_mode);
+
+ if (mode == old_mode) {
+ this_cpu_inc(xen_lazy_nesting);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(old_mode != XEN_LAZY_NONE);
this_cpu_write(xen_lazy_mode, mode);
}
@@ -84,7 +92,10 @@ static inline void leave_lazy(enum xen_lazy_mode mode)
{
BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(xen_lazy_mode) != mode);
- this_cpu_write(xen_lazy_mode, XEN_LAZY_NONE);
+ if (this_cpu_read(xen_lazy_nesting) == 0)
+ this_cpu_write(xen_lazy_mode, XEN_LAZY_NONE);
+ else
+ this_cpu_dec(xen_lazy_nesting);
}
enum xen_lazy_mode xen_get_lazy_mode(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
index 54b83825c4b6..bbbfdd495ebd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct tls_descs {
};
DEFINE_PER_CPU(enum xen_lazy_mode, xen_lazy_mode) = XEN_LAZY_NONE;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, xen_lazy_nesting);
enum xen_lazy_mode xen_get_lazy_mode(void)
{
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists