linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 3/6] mm/rmap: move folio_test_anon() check out of __folio_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230913125113.313322-4-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:51:10 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/6] mm/rmap: move folio_test_anon() check out of __folio_set_anon()

Let's handle it in the caller; no need for the "first" check based on
the mapcount.

We really only end up with !anon pages in page_add_anon_rmap() via
do_swap_page(), where we hold the folio lock. So races are not possible.
Add a VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO() to make sure that we really hold the folio
lock.

In the future, we might want to let do_swap_page() use
folio_add_new_anon_rmap() on new pages instead: however, we might have
to pass then whether the folio is exclusive or not. So keep it in there
for now.

For hugetlb we never expect to have a non-anon page in
hugepage_add_anon_rmap(). Remove that code, along with some other checks
that are either not required or were checked in
hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap() already.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 mm/rmap.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index ab16baa0fcb3..1ac5bd1b8169 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1135,9 +1135,6 @@ static void __folio_set_anon(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	BUG_ON(!anon_vma);
 
-	if (folio_test_anon(folio))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * If the folio isn't exclusive to this vma, we must use the _oldest_
 	 * possible anon_vma for the folio mapping!
@@ -1239,12 +1236,12 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (nr)
 		__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ANON_MAPPED, nr);
 
-	if (likely(!folio_test_ksm(folio))) {
-		if (first)
-			__folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address,
-					 !!(flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE));
-		else
-			__page_check_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address);
+	if (unlikely(!folio_test_anon(folio))) {
+		VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+		__folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address,
+				 !!(flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE));
+	} else if (likely(!folio_test_ksm(folio))) {
+		__page_check_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address);
 	}
 	if (flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE)
 		SetPageAnonExclusive(page);
@@ -2528,17 +2525,13 @@ void hugepage_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			    unsigned long address, rmap_t flags)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
-	struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
 	int first;
 
-	BUG_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
-	BUG_ON(!anon_vma);
+	VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
+
 	first = atomic_inc_and_test(&folio->_entire_mapcount);
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!first && (flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE), page);
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!first && PageAnonExclusive(page), page);
-	if (first)
-		__folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address,
-				 !!(flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE));
 	if (flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE)
 		SetPageAnonExclusive(page);
 }
-- 
2.41.0