linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230913130626.217665-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:06:22 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
        Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure

From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>

The interception handler for the PQAP(AQIC) command calls the
kvm_s390_gisc_register function to register the guest ISC with the channel
subsystem. If that call fails, the status response code 08 - indicating
Invalid ZONE/GISA designation - is returned to the guest. This response
code does not make sense because the non-zero return code from the
kvm_s390_gisc_register function can be due one of two things: Either the
ISC passed as a parameter by the guest to the PQAP(AQIC) command is greater
than the maximum ISC value allowed, or the guest is not using a GISA.

Since this scenario is very unlikely to happen and there is no status
response code to indicate an invalid ISC value, let's set the
response code to 06 indicating 'Invalid address of AP-queue notification
byte'. While this is not entirely accurate, it is better than indicating
that the ZONE/GISA designation is invalid which is something the guest
can do nothing about since those values are set by the hypervisor.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 9cb28978c186..e7e4dbbf5ad3 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int ensure_nib_shared(unsigned long addr, struct gmap *gmap)
  * host ISC to issue the host side PQAP/AQIC
  *
  * Response.status may be set to AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS in case the
- * vfio_pin_pages failed.
+ * vfio_pin_pages or kvm_s390_gisc_register failed.
  *
  * Otherwise return the ap_queue_status returned by the ap_aqic(),
  * all retry handling will be done by the guest.
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
 				 __func__, nisc, isc, q->apqn);

 		vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, nib, 1);
-		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA;
+		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS;
 		return status;
 	}

-- 
2.41.0