[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQHIgmcnCNoZwtwu@xhacker>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:34:42 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: stmmac: use per-queue
64 bit statistics where necessary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:30:14AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:24 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > >
> > > The newly added "struct u64_stats_sync syncp" uses a seqlock
> > > internally, which is broken into multiple words on 32bit machines, and
> > > needs to be initialized properly. You need to call u64_stats_init on
> > > syncp before first usage.
> >
> > This is done. The problematic thing is that in stmmac_open() ->
> > __stmmac_open() the syncp initialized before is overwritten by
> >
> > memcpy(&priv->dma_conf, dma_conf, sizeof(*dma_conf));
Thank Johannes and Uwe for pointing out the issue.
> >
> > Do I need to point out that this is ugly?
>
> I think it also leaks the (lockdep) state since it reinits the syncp
> (and a lot of other state) doing this. This is also called when the MTU
> changes.
>
> Also, I couldn't convince myself that it's even race-free? Even if it
> is, it's not really obvious, IMHO.
>
> So it seems to me that really this needs to be split into data that
> actually should be reinitialized, and data that shouldn't, or just not
> use memcpy() here but copy only the relevant state?
Since we are in rc1, I need to fix the bug with as small changes as
possible. so another solution could be: replace rx/tx stats structure
with pointers, then setup pointers in the new allocated dma_conf with
the old one as current code did for dma_tx_size/dma_rx_size in
stmmac_setup_dma_desc():
dma_conf->dma_tx_size = priv->dma_conf.dma_tx_size
Is it acceptable?
Thanks
>
> But anyway, I have no skin in this game - just reviewing this because I
> was trying to help out Uwe.
>
> johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists