[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQMjouJ+TpuEHtIW@swahl-home.5wahls.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:15:46 -0500
From: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@....com>,
Kyle Meyer <kyle.meyer@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/platform/uv: Rework NMI "action" modparam handling
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:06:51PM -0500, Steve Wahl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Maybe rework the message so a possible newline doesn't look so
> awkward, by removing the comma?
>
> > + pr_err("UV: Invalid NMI action:%s Valid actions are:\n", val);
It occurred to me overnight that leaving val out completely is an
option, as printing it adds very little value. So a reasonable option
would be:
+ pr_err("UV: Invalid NMI action. Valid actions are:\n");
--> Steve
--
Steve Wahl, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Powered by blists - more mailing lists