[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230914-nolibc-syscall-nr-v1-3-e50df410da11@weissschuh.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:01:19 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number
All symbols created by nolibc are also visible to user code.
Syscall constants are expected to come from the kernel headers and
should not be made up by nolibc.
Refactor the logic to avoid defining syscall numbers.
Also the new code is easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
---
tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
index bc56310c6bdf..d96f2aa7d987 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
@@ -954,11 +954,10 @@ int sys_select(int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set *wfds, fd_set *efds, struct timeva
t.tv_nsec = timeout->tv_usec * 1000;
}
return my_syscall6(__NR_pselect6, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout ? &t : NULL, NULL);
-#elif defined(__NR__newselect) || defined(__NR_select)
-#ifndef __NR__newselect
-#define __NR__newselect __NR_select
-#endif
+#elif defined(__NR__newselect)
return my_syscall5(__NR__newselect, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout);
+#elif defined(__NR_select)
+ return my_syscall5(__NR_select, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout);
#else
(void)nfds;
(void)rfds;
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists