[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230914100203.e5905ee145b7cb580c8df9c4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:02:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ben Wolsieffer <ben.wolsieffer@...ring.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>,
Ben Wolsieffer <Ben.Wolsieffer@...ring.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: nommu: /proc/<pid>/maps: release mmap read lock
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:30:20 -0400 Ben Wolsieffer <ben.wolsieffer@...ring.com> wrote:
> The no-MMU implementation of /proc/<pid>/map doesn't normally release
> the mmap read lock, because it uses !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_vml) to determine
> whether to release the lock. Since _vml is NULL when the end of the
> mappings is reached, the lock is not released.
>
> This code was incorrectly adapted from the MMU implementation, which
> at the time released the lock in m_next() before returning the last entry.
>
> The MMU implementation has diverged further from the no-MMU version
> since then, so this patch brings their locking and error handling into
> sync, fixing the bug and hopefully avoiding similar issues in the
> future.
Thanks. Is this bug demonstrable from userspace? If so, how?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists