| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230914172138.11977-13-james.morse@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 17:21:26 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
xingxin.hx@...nanolis.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow
The limbo and overflow code picks a CPU to use from the domain's list
of online CPUs. Work is then scheduled on these CPUs to maintain
the limbo list and any counters that may overflow.
cpumask_any() may pick a CPU that is marked nohz_full, which will
either penalise the work that CPU was dedicated to, or delay the
processing of limbo list or counters that may overflow. Perhaps
indefinitely. Delaying the overflow handling will skew the bandwidth
values calculated by mba_sc, which expects to be called once a second.
Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() as a replacement for cpumask_any()
that prefers housekeeping CPUs. This helper will still return
a nohz_full CPU if that is the only option. The CPU to use is
re-evaluated each time the limbo/overflow work runs. This ensures
the work will move off a nohz_full CPU once a housekeeping CPU is
available.
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Tested-By: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
---
Changes since v3:
* typos fixed
Changes since v4:
* Made temporary variables unsigned
Changes since v5:
* Restructured cpumask_any_housekeeping() to avoid later churn.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index f06d3d3e0808..37bb3de37a4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/kernfs.h>
#include <linux/fs_context.h>
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <asm/resctrl.h>
#define L3_QOS_CDP_ENABLE 0x01ULL
@@ -55,6 +56,29 @@
/* Max event bits supported */
#define MAX_EVT_CONFIG_BITS GENMASK(6, 0)
+/**
+ * cpumask_any_housekeeping() - Choose any CPU in @mask, preferring those that
+ * aren't marked nohz_full
+ * @mask: The mask to pick a CPU from.
+ *
+ * Returns a CPU in @mask. If there are housekeeping CPUs that don't use
+ * nohz_full, these are preferred.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_housekeeping(const struct cpumask *mask)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu, hk_cpu;
+
+ cpu = cpumask_any(mask);
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+ return cpu;
+
+ hk_cpu = cpumask_nth_andnot(0, mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
+ if (hk_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ cpu = hk_cpu;
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
struct rdt_fs_context {
struct kernfs_fs_context kfc;
bool enable_cdpl2;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 0bbed8c62d42..993837e46db1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -782,9 +782,9 @@ static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work)
{
unsigned long delay = msecs_to_jiffies(CQM_LIMBOCHECK_INTERVAL);
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct rdt_resource *r;
struct rdt_domain *d;
+ int cpu;
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
@@ -793,8 +793,10 @@ void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work)
__check_limbo(d, false);
- if (has_busy_rmid(d))
+ if (has_busy_rmid(d)) {
+ cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(&d->cpu_mask);
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &d->cqm_limbo, delay);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
}
@@ -804,7 +806,7 @@ void cqm_setup_limbo_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms)
unsigned long delay = msecs_to_jiffies(delay_ms);
int cpu;
- cpu = cpumask_any(&dom->cpu_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(&dom->cpu_mask);
dom->cqm_work_cpu = cpu;
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dom->cqm_limbo, delay);
@@ -814,10 +816,10 @@ void mbm_handle_overflow(struct work_struct *work)
{
unsigned long delay = msecs_to_jiffies(MBM_OVERFLOW_INTERVAL);
struct rdtgroup *prgrp, *crgrp;
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct list_head *head;
struct rdt_resource *r;
struct rdt_domain *d;
+ int cpu;
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
@@ -838,6 +840,11 @@ void mbm_handle_overflow(struct work_struct *work)
update_mba_bw(prgrp, d);
}
+ /*
+ * Re-check for housekeeping CPUs. This allows the overflow handler to
+ * move off a nohz_full CPU quickly.
+ */
+ cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(&d->cpu_mask);
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &d->mbm_over, delay);
out_unlock:
@@ -851,7 +858,7 @@ void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms)
if (!static_branch_likely(&rdt_mon_enable_key))
return;
- cpu = cpumask_any(&dom->cpu_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(&dom->cpu_mask);
dom->mbm_work_cpu = cpu;
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dom->mbm_over, delay);
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists