linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: Suggest a longer expected time for responses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABxcv==jJvujerZNmN8PXF1-YYXy4Ra1WAHcmX4YUJRbRPUPzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:10:43 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: Suggest a longer expected time
 for responses

Hello Mark,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:57 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> While some subsystems do typically have very fast turnaround times on
> review this is far from standard over the kernel and is likely to set
> unrealistic expectations for submitters.  Tell submitters to expect 2-3
> weeks instead, this will cover more of the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>

Agreed that 2-3 weeks is more realistic.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>