linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86/platform/uv: refactor deprecated strcpy and strncpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQKohp0plVd4S5St@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:30:30 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/platform/uv: refactor deprecated strcpy and
 strncpy


* Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:

> >> Which IMHO is much more readable then what has landed now. But since 
> >> v2 has already landed I guess the best thing is just to stick with 
> >> what we have upstream now...
> > 
> > Well, how about we do a delta patch with all the changes you suggested? 
> > I'm all for readability.
> 
> So I started doing this and notices that all the string manipulation + 
> parsing done here is really just a DYI implementation of 
> sysfs_match_string().
> 
> So I have prepared a patch to switch to sysfs_match_string(), which 
> completely removes the need to make a copy of the val string.
> 
> I'll submit the patch right after this email.

Thank you - that looks a far more thorough cleanup indeed.

	Ingo