[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc25b9ba-08e6-24e1-8e21-f3e43bb73311@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:11:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node
On 14/09/2023 08:53, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node
>>
>> On 14/09/2023 08:04, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: imx93: update gpio node
>>>>
>>>> On 14/09/2023 04:21, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Per binding doc, i.MX93 GPIO supports two interrupts, and not
>>>>> compatible with i.MX7ULP. So update the node
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
>>>>> index 6f85a05ee7e1..011c34a57c53 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -825,11 +825,12 @@ usdhc3: mmc@...b0000 {
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> gpio2: gpio@...10080 {
>>>>> - compatible = "fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio";
>>>>> + compatible = "fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
>>>>
>>>> As your driver change points, it is breaking users, so no :(
>>>
>>> ok. Although i.MX93 GPIO is not compatible with i.MX7ULP from HW
>>> perspective, the compatible string should keep as it is now and
>>> binding
>>
>> If it is not compatible, then how could it work before?
>
> i.MX7ULP reg:
> 0h Port Data Output Register (PDOR)
> 4h Port Set Output Register (PSOR)
> 8h Port Clear Output Register (PCOR)
> Ch Port Toggle Output Register (PTOR)
> 10h Port Data Input Register (PDIR)
> 14h Port Data Direction Register (PDDR)
>
> i.MX8ULP/93 has different registers address, but
> i.MX93 registers has 0x40 off as below:
> 40h Port Data Output (PDOR)
>
> Even linux i.MX7ULP gpio driver could work with i.MX8ULP/93
> GPIO HW with dts node using an 0x40 offset + base addr
> for i.MX93 gpio. I think from hw design, they are
> not compatible. Besides the upper differences,
> there are other differences.
Sorry, I don't understand it. I asked how could they work before in
Linux, if they are not compatible, and you pasted regs.
So again - if they are not compatible, how could it work? Or maybe it
never worked? But then commit msg would say it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists