[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB9PR04MB928456C515C3D53744A04B1087F7A@DB9PR04MB9284.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 07:52:02 +0000
From: Hui Fang <hui.fang@....com>
To: "tfiga@...omium.org" <tfiga@...omium.org>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anle Pan <anle.pan@....com>, Xuegang Liu <xuegang.liu@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] MA-21654 Use dma_alloc_pages in
vb2_dma_sg_alloc_compacted
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 15:41 PM Fang Hui <hui.fang@....com> wrote:
> On system with "CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y", if the allocated physical address is
> greater than 4G, swiotlb will be used. It will lead below defects.
> 1) Impact performance due to an extra memcpy.
> 2) May meet below error due to swiotlb_max_mapping_size()
> is 256K (IO_TLB_SIZE * IO_TLB_SEGSIZE).
> "swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 393216 bytes), total 65536 (slots), used 2358 (slots)"
>
> To avoid those defects, use dma_alloc_pages() instead of alloc_pages() in
> vb2_dma_sg_alloc_compacted().
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fang Hui <hui.fang@....com>
---
Two things.
1. For dma_data_direction para (DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is used) of dma_alloc_pages(),
maybe better pass from callers? In DeviceAsWebcam case, it's DMA_TO_DEVICE.
2. "MA-21654" (NXP ticket number) should be removed in the comment, need I
re-push or it will be done on your side, thanks!
BRs,
Fang Hui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists