lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:01:22 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: enable polling in Exynos 4210

On 11/09/2023 15:34, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
> It seems that thermal in Exynos 4210 is broken without this, as it will
> never decrease cooling after increasing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Just uploaded separately from all the thermal: exynos:
>   patches with a shorter recipient list, no change otherwise.
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4210.dtsi | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4210.dtsi
> index 0e27c3375e2e..aae185b7f91c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4210.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4210.dtsi
> @@ -391,8 +391,14 @@ &cpu_alert2 {
>  };
>  
>  &cpu_thermal {
> -	polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> -	polling-delay = <0>;
> +	/* Exynos 4210 supports thermal interrupts, but only for the rising threshold.

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

I fixed it up and applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ