linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: use gpiod_set_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4de724a1630eda74f4f304dc224dc981eb3b0875.camel@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:30:13 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: use gpiod_set_active_high()

Hi,

Le jeudi 14 septembre 2023 à 10:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:23 PM Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > linus.walleij@...aro.org wrote on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:12:40 +0200:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > > > <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > Why not moving this quirk to gpiolib-of.c?
> > > 
> > > That's a better idea here I think, it's clearly a quirk for a
> > > buggy device tree.
> > 
> > Agreed, it's just for backward compatibility purposes in a single
> > driver. I believe it should stay here.
> 
> I believe Linus was for moving.

Which Linus? Because the one who's also the gpio maintainer just wrote
above that it was better to keep it in the driver.

Cheers,
-Paul

> 
> gpiolib-of.c contains a lot of quirks, including this one. Calling
> these new (or old) APIs for overriding polarity in many cases
> shouldn't be needed if were no issues with DT or something like that.
>