linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow default substream bypass with a pasid support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQLf4uNNQ2YSnD4L@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:26:42 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To:     Michael Shavit <mshavit@...gle.com>
CC:     Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
        <will@...nel.org>, <jgg@...dia.com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
        <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow default substream bypass
 with a pasid support

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 05:01:58PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:03 AM Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com> wrote:
> >
> > This has another version [1] rebased on top of Michael's refactor
> > series [2]. We'd need Michael to respin the refactor sereis and I
> > will resend mine.
> 
> Just to clarify, you'd like me to rebase off master and re-send? Or do
> you mean something else by respin?

Usually we resend patches that were not accepted in the previous
cycle, rebasing on top of the new rc1. So, I would checkout the
6.6-rc1 branch and rebase the series with necessary editing, and
then send another version.

That refactor series is quite crucial for other feature series.
So, it'd be nicer to merge it as early as possible.

Thanks
Nicolin