[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQL6ItDgXFgJyU+M@bfoster>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:18:42 -0400
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] bcachefs: Modify mismatched function name
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 05:04:49PM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> No functional modification involved.
>
> fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c:514: warning: expecting prototype for bch_bucket_alloc(). Prototype was for bch2_bucket_alloc_trans() instead.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=6584
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
JFYI, it seems like the patch series is oddly threaded with patch 9/9
being the "cover letter..?"
Also, what's the granularity of the patches here? Per robot filed bug?
Per source file? I don't think it really matters for this particular
series, though personally I would probably squash these down into one
upon merge (and prefer to see any further patches of this nature
similarly condensed).
Brian
> fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c b/fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c
> index e02749ddc362..10a7979707ef 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/alloc_foreground.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static struct open_bucket *bch2_bucket_alloc_freelist(struct btree_trans *trans,
> }
>
> /**
> - * bch_bucket_alloc - allocate a single bucket from a specific device
> + * bch2_bucket_alloc_trans - allocate a single bucket from a specific device
> *
> * Returns index of bucket on success, 0 on failure
> */
> --
> 2.20.1.7.g153144c
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists