linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/tests: Flag slow tests as such

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <wnqxfgo7tljhecw2cajoeb3aga3szfen6eohowjrepfqwakka5@pm6a7iaii7fy>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:24:40 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/tests: Flag slow tests as such

Hi Sima,

(For some reason, it looks like your mailer sets up the headers to reply
to every recipient but you)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:36:12AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Kunit recently gained a speed attribute that allows to filter out slow
> > tests. A slow test is defined in the documentation as a test taking more
> > than a second to execute.
> > 
> > Let's flag the few tests that are doing so on my machine when running:
> > 
> > ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests \
> > 	--cross_compile aarch64-linux-gnu- --arch arm64
> > 
> > Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> 
> Ugh ... not a fan.
> 
> igt has a really bad habit of making disastrously combinatorial tests with
> impossible runtimes, and then just filtering these out so it's still fast.
> 
> Maybe some stress tests for overall system make sense like this, but
> absolutely not for unit tests.

I agree, I didn't want to reduce testing though.

> And I did spot check some of these, they're just combinatorial
> explosions with large repetition counts and some fun stuff like going
> through prime numbers because surely that's a good idea.
> 
> Imo delete them all, and if that causes a real gap in coverage, ask
> the authors to write some actual good unit tests for these corner
> cases.

Ack, I will send a patch doing so.

Thanks!
Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)