[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac528d48-44f9-4717-a61d-35365a11de78@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:22:37 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com,
Alexandru Tachici <alexandru.tachici@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] Add support for OPEN Alliance
10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 03:56:59PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is interesting, by chance I just looked at a chip claiming
> similar features today, which already has a driver in kernel: Analog
> Devices ADIN1110.
Ah, interesting. I had no idea this driver/device is an OA TC6 device.
So ideally, we want the adin1110.c to also use the new framework, and
remove the duplicate code. Parthiban, please look at the driver and
make sure the APIs are such that Alexandru Tachici can swap his driver
to using it. Having two implementations should help make it clear what
is the same and what is different.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists