lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:28:39 +0800
From:   Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...o.com>
To:     Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wuyun.abel@...edance.com, robin.lu@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] mm: Add policy_name to identify
 OOM policies



在 2023/9/14 20:50, Chuyi Zhou 写道:
>>
>> Delete set_oom_policy_name, it makes no sense for users to set policy 
>> names. 🙂
>>
> 
> There can be multiple OOM policy in the system at the same time.
> 
> If we need to apply different OOM policies to different memcgs based on 
> different scenarios, we can use this hook(set_oom_policy_name) to set 
> name to identify which policy in invoked at that time.
> 
> Just some thoughts.
Well, I thought the system would only load one OOM policy(set one policy 
name), which would set the prio of all memcgs.

What you mean is that multiple bpf.c may be loaded at the system, and 
each bpf.c sets the different policy for different memcgs?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ