linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/user_events: Fix failures when user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:02:32 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org,
        anders.roxell@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/user_events: Fix failures when user_events
 is not installed

On 9/15/23 09:54, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/12/23 11:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:12:34 -0700
>> Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I guess I was wrong and some people do care ;-)
>>>>
>>>> -- Steve
>>>
>>> It looks like this change got applied [1] to the fixes branch of
>>> linux-kselftest. I can either send a V3 with this addressed or build a
>>> patch based upon the fixes branch on top of this one to address it.
>>>
>>> Which way do you all prefer?
> 
> Please send me patch on top of this one on linux-kselftest fixes.
> 

One more thing. I am sending pull request now with this patch to address
the test failures.

Please send the unmount fix as soon as possible to include it in the next
rc.

thanks,
-- Shuah