[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <59a39f152a344cdfd26ca9f802562fc14a449d38.1694693889.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:58:09 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jgg@...dia.com,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Don't register fwnode for legacy binding
When using the legacy binding we bypass the of_xlate mechanism, so avoid
registering the instance fwnodes which act as keys for that. This will
help __iommu_probe_device() to retrieve the registered ops the same way
as for x86 etc. when no fwspec has previously been set up by of_xlate.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index d6d1a2a55cc0..4b83a3adacd6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -2161,7 +2161,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return err;
}
- err = iommu_device_register(&smmu->iommu, &arm_smmu_ops, dev);
+ err = iommu_device_register(&smmu->iommu, &arm_smmu_ops,
+ using_legacy_binding ? NULL : dev);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to register iommu\n");
iommu_device_sysfs_remove(&smmu->iommu);
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists