| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:38:26 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
To: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: p.raghav@...sung.com, david@...morbit.com, da.gomez@...sung.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
willy@...radead.org, djwong@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
chandan.babu@...cle.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: [RFC 01/23] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Some filesystems want to be able to limit the maximum size of folios,
and some want to be able to ensure that folios are at least a certain
size. Add mapping_set_folio_orders() to allow this level of control.
The max folio order parameter is ignored and it is always set to
MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER.
[Pankaj]: added mapping_min_folio_order(), changed MAX_MASK to 0x0003e000
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
[mcgrof: rebase in light of "mm, netfs, fscache: stop read optimisation
when folio removed from pagecache" which adds AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 759b29d9a69a..d2b5308cc59e 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -202,10 +202,16 @@ enum mapping_flags {
AS_EXITING = 4, /* final truncate in progress */
/* writeback related tags are not used */
AS_NO_WRITEBACK_TAGS = 5,
- AS_LARGE_FOLIO_SUPPORT = 6,
- AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS, /* Call ->release_folio(), even if no private data */
+ AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS = 6, /* Call ->release_folio(), even if no private data */
+ AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN = 8,
+ AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX = 13,
+ /* 8-17 are used for FOLIO_ORDER */
};
+#define AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN_MASK 0x00001f00
+#define AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX_MASK 0x0003e000
+#define AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MASK (AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN_MASK | AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX_MASK)
+
/**
* mapping_set_error - record a writeback error in the address_space
* @mapping: the mapping in which an error should be set
@@ -310,6 +316,46 @@ static inline void mapping_set_gfp_mask(struct address_space *m, gfp_t mask)
m->gfp_mask = mask;
}
+/*
+ * There are some parts of the kernel which assume that PMD entries
+ * are exactly HPAGE_PMD_ORDER. Those should be fixed, but until then,
+ * limit the maximum allocation order to PMD size. I'm not aware of any
+ * assumptions about maximum order if THP are disabled, but 8 seems like
+ * a good order (that's 1MB if you're using 4kB pages)
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+#define MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
+#else
+#define MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER 8
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * mapping_set_folio_orders() - Set the range of folio sizes supported.
+ * @mapping: The file.
+ * @min: Minimum folio order (between 0-MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER inclusive).
+ * @max: Maximum folio order (between 0-MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER inclusive).
+ *
+ * The filesystem should call this function in its inode constructor to
+ * indicate which sizes of folio the VFS can use to cache the contents
+ * of the file. This should only be used if the filesystem needs special
+ * handling of folio sizes (ie there is something the core cannot know).
+ * Do not tune it based on, eg, i_size.
+ *
+ * Context: This should not be called while the inode is active as it
+ * is non-atomic.
+ */
+static inline void mapping_set_folio_orders(struct address_space *mapping,
+ unsigned int min, unsigned int max)
+{
+ /*
+ * XXX: max is ignored as only minimum folio order is supported
+ * currently.
+ */
+ mapping->flags = (mapping->flags & ~AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MASK) |
+ (min << AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN) |
+ (MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER << AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX);
+}
+
/**
* mapping_set_large_folios() - Indicate the file supports large folios.
* @mapping: The file.
@@ -323,7 +369,17 @@ static inline void mapping_set_gfp_mask(struct address_space *m, gfp_t mask)
*/
static inline void mapping_set_large_folios(struct address_space *mapping)
{
- __set_bit(AS_LARGE_FOLIO_SUPPORT, &mapping->flags);
+ mapping_set_folio_orders(mapping, 0, MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int mapping_max_folio_order(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ return (mapping->flags & AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX_MASK) >> AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int mapping_min_folio_order(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ return (mapping->flags & AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN_MASK) >> AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN;
}
/*
@@ -332,8 +388,7 @@ static inline void mapping_set_large_folios(struct address_space *mapping)
*/
static inline bool mapping_large_folio_support(struct address_space *mapping)
{
- return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
- test_bit(AS_LARGE_FOLIO_SUPPORT, &mapping->flags);
+ return mapping_max_folio_order(mapping) > 0;
}
static inline int filemap_nr_thps(struct address_space *mapping)
@@ -494,19 +549,6 @@ static inline void *detach_page_private(struct page *page)
return folio_detach_private(page_folio(page));
}
-/*
- * There are some parts of the kernel which assume that PMD entries
- * are exactly HPAGE_PMD_ORDER. Those should be fixed, but until then,
- * limit the maximum allocation order to PMD size. I'm not aware of any
- * assumptions about maximum order if THP are disabled, but 8 seems like
- * a good order (that's 1MB if you're using 4kB pages)
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-#define MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
-#else
-#define MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER 8
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
struct folio *filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order);
#else
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists