[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQSspmE8Ww8/UNkH@work>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:12:38 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] tls: Use size_add() in call to struct_size()
If, for any reason, the open-coded arithmetic causes a wraparound,
the protection that `struct_size()` adds against potential integer
overflows is defeated. Fix this by hardening call to `struct_size()`
with `size_add()`.
Fixes: b89fec54fd61 ("tls: rx: wrap decrypt params in a struct")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index d1fc295b83b5..270712b8d391 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static int tls_decrypt_sg(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *out_iov,
*/
aead_size = sizeof(*aead_req) + crypto_aead_reqsize(ctx->aead_recv);
aead_size = ALIGN(aead_size, __alignof__(*dctx));
- mem = kmalloc(aead_size + struct_size(dctx, sg, n_sgin + n_sgout),
+ mem = kmalloc(aead_size + struct_size(dctx, sg, size_add(n_sgin, n_sgout)),
sk->sk_allocation);
if (!mem) {
err = -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists