[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f805f647-24b2-fc66-afd0-9a428947a9df@salutedevices.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 22:30:55 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] vsock/test: add recv_buf()/send_buf()
utility functions and some improvements
On 15.09.2023 15:14, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> We recently found that some tests were failing [1].
>
> The problem was that we were not waiting for all the bytes correctly,
> so we had a partial read. I had initially suggested using MSG_WAITALL,
> but this could have timeout problems.
>
> Since we already had send_byte() and recv_byte() that handled the timeout,
> but also the expected return value, I moved that code to two new functions
> that we can now use to send/receive generic buffers.
>
> The last commit is just an improvement to a test I found difficult to
> understand while using the new functions.
>
> @Arseniy a review and some testing are really appreciated :-)
Thanks for this cleanup of the tests, I reviewed this patchset and run local
testing, seems everything is ok! :)
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/63xflnwiohdfo6m3vnrrxgv2ulplencpwug5qqacugqh7xxpu3@tsczkuqgwurb/
>
> Stefano Garzarella (5):
> vsock/test: add recv_buf() utility function
> vsock/test: use recv_buf() in vsock_test.c
> vsock/test: add send_buf() utility function
> vsock/test: use send_buf() in vsock_test.c
> vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
>
> tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 3 +
> tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 124 ++++++++++++--------
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 187 ++++++-------------------------
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists