[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQS0UGQMbUCYr2t3@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:45:20 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Pankaj Raghav <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
p.raghav@...sung.com, david@...morbit.com, da.gomez@...sung.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 05/23] filemap: align index to mapping_min_order in
filemap_range_has_page()
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:38:30PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>
> page cache is mapping min_folio_order aligned. Use mapping min_folio_order
> to align the start_byte and end_byte in filemap_range_has_page().
What goes wrong if you don't? Seems to me like it should work.
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 2c47729dc8b0..4dee24b5b61c 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -477,9 +477,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_flush);
> bool filemap_range_has_page(struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t start_byte, loff_t end_byte)
> {
> + unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
> + unsigned int nrpages = 1UL << min_order;
> + pgoff_t index = round_down(start_byte >> PAGE_SHIFT, nrpages);
> struct folio *folio;
> - XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, start_byte >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> - pgoff_t max = end_byte >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index);
> + pgoff_t max = round_down(end_byte >> PAGE_SHIFT, nrpages);
>
> if (end_byte < start_byte)
> return false;
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists