[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309151356.1A6AC69@keescook>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:56:58 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@...gle.com>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
corbet@....net, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
jannh@...gle.com, evn@...gle.com, poprdi@...gle.com,
jordyzomer@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/14] mm/slub: move kmem_cache_order_objects to
slab.h
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:59:22AM +0000, Matteo Rizzo wrote:
> From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
>
> This is refactoring for SLAB_VIRTUAL. The implementation needs to know
> the order of the virtual memory region allocated to each slab to know
> how much physical memory to allocate when the slab is reused. We reuse
> kmem_cache_order_objects for this, so we have to move it before struct
> slab.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Yay mechanical changes.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists