linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: riscv: selftests: Change vcpu_has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:14:15 +0800
From:   Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc:     Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
        Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: riscv: selftests: Change vcpu_has_ext to a
 common function

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 5:05 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:37:02AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Move vcpu_has_ext to the processor.c and rename it to __vcpu_has_ext
> > so that other test cases can use it for vCPU extension check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h      |  2 ++
> >  .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c  |  9 +++++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 16 +---------------
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> > index 2c975d9cead2..7d5517648ea7 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> > @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ static inline uint64_t __kvm_reg_id(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx,
> >  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(idx)       __kvm_reg_id(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT, \
> >                                            idx, KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG)
> >
> > +bool __vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext);
> > +
> >  struct ex_regs {
> >       unsigned long ra;
> >       unsigned long sp;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> > index 39a1e9902dec..e527ad0abc30 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@
> >
> >  static vm_vaddr_t exception_handlers;
> >
> > +bool __vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned long value = 0;
> > +
> > +     __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
> > +
> > +     return !!value;
>
> I'd rather not assume that value will remain zero across a system call
> which fails. Let's write this as
>
>      unsigned long value = 0;
>      int ret;
>
>      ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
>
>      return !ret && !!value;
>

Sure. Thanks for the suggestion!

> > +}
> > +
> >  static uint64_t page_align(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t v)
> >  {
> >       return (v + vm->page_size) & ~(vm->page_size - 1);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > index d8ecacd03ecf..0dcff823f287 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > @@ -44,20 +44,6 @@ bool check_reject_set(int err)
> >       return err == EINVAL;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline bool vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
> > -{
> > -     int ret;
> > -     unsigned long value;
> > -
> > -     ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
> > -     if (ret) {
> > -             printf("Failed to get ext %d", ext);
> > -             return false;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     return !!value;
> > -}
> > -
> >  void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> >  {
> >       struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> > @@ -77,7 +63,7 @@ void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> >               __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(s->feature), 1);
> >
> >               /* Double check whether the desired extension was enabled */
> > -             __TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_has_ext(vcpu, s->feature),
> > +             __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_ext(vcpu, s->feature),
> >                              "%s not available, skipping tests\n", s->name);
> >       }
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>
> Thanks,
> drew