[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6575702e-fea5-61b2-dd61-7b556a8603e8@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 02:16:50 +0100
From: andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org, jgross@...e.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/38] x86/msr: Add the WRMSRNS instruction support
On 15/09/2023 2:01 am, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The whole bit with alternatives and pvops being separate is a major
> maintainability problem, and honestly it never made any sense in the
> first place. Never have two mechanisms to do one job; it makes it
> harder to grok their interactions.
This bit is easy.
Juergen has already done the work to delete one of these two patching
mechanisms and replace it with the other.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a32e211f-4add-4fb2-9e5a-480ae9b9bbf2@suse.com/
Unfortunately, it's only collecting pings and tumbleweeds.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists