[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309151620439011387@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:20:43 +0800 (CST)
From: <cheng.lin130@....com.cn>
To: <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: <djwong@...nel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jiang.yong5@....com.cn>,
<wang.liang82@....com.cn>, <liu.dong3@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: introduce protection for drop nlink
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:44:45PM +0800, cheng.lin130@....com.cn wrote:
> > From: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@....com.cn>
> >
> > When abnormal drop_nlink are detected on the inode,
> > shutdown filesystem, to avoid corruption propagation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@....com.cn>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index 9e62cc500..40cc106ae 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@ -919,6 +919,15 @@ xfs_droplink(
> > xfs_trans_t *tp,
> > xfs_inode_t *ip)
> > {
> > +
> > + if (VFS_I(ip)->i_nlink == 0) {
> > + xfs_alert(ip->i_mount,
> > + "%s: Deleting inode %llu with no links.",
> > + __func__, ip->i_ino);
> > + tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DIRTY;
> Marking the transaction dirty is not necessary.
> Otherwise this seems fine.
I found the transaction maybe not dirty at this point. Dirty the transaction
can make sure to shutdown fs in subsequent xfs_trans_cancel().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists