[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c993ecc1-771e-4061-bd10-d3dea1254389@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:52:43 +0800
From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: <geert+renesas@...der.be>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
<rafal@...ecki.pl>, <peng.fan@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
<quic_shashim@...cinc.com>, <quic_kaushalk@...cinc.com>,
<quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
<quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SM4450
SoC
在 9/15/2023 3:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 15/09/2023 04:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>> Add the SoC specific compatible for SM4450 implementing arm,mmu-500.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> index cf29ab10501c..b57751c8ad90 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sdx75-smmu-500
>> + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
>> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500
>> - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
>> + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500
>
> Isn't there comment just few lines above your edit? Comment saying DON'T?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi Kraysztof
I seems haven't understand your comments totaly.
I want to confirm that if you think only need "qcom,smmu-500" and
"arm,mmu-500" compitbale name, needn't specific compitable name for each
platform?
--
Thx and BRs,
Tengfei Fan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists