[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQQkthfNuV3dOhZe@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:32:38 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Fix build of UML with KASAN
* Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:
> Building UML with KASAN fails since commit 69d4c0d32186 ("entry, kasan,
> x86: Disallow overriding mem*() functions") with the following errors:
>
> $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kconfig_add CONFIG_KASAN=y
> ...
> ld: mm/kasan/shadow.o: in function `memset':
> shadow.c:(.text+0x40): multiple definition of `memset';
> arch/x86/lib/memset_64.o:(.noinstr.text+0x0): first defined here
> ld: mm/kasan/shadow.o: in function `memmove':
> shadow.c:(.text+0x90): multiple definition of `memmove';
> arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.o:(.noinstr.text+0x0): first defined here
> ld: mm/kasan/shadow.o: in function `memcpy':
> shadow.c:(.text+0x110): multiple definition of `memcpy';
> arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o:(.noinstr.text+0x0): first defined here
So the breakage was ~9 months ago, and apparently nobody build-tested UML?
Does UML boot with the fix?
> UML does not use GENERIC_ENTRY and is still supposed to be allowed to
> override the mem*() functions, so use weak aliases in that case.
>
> Fixes: 69d4c0d32186 ("entry, kasan, x86: Disallow overriding mem*() functions")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use CONFIG_UML instead of CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609-uml-kasan-v1-1-5fac8d409d4f@axis.com
> ---
> arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.S | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/lib/memset_64.S | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> index 8f95fb267caa..47b004851cf3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> @@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(__memcpy)
> SYM_FUNC_END(__memcpy)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UML
> +SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_WEAK(memcpy, __memcpy)
> +#else
> SYM_FUNC_ALIAS(memcpy, __memcpy)
> +#endif
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy)
Meh, the extra 3 #ifdefs are rather ugly and don't really express UML's
expectations here.
So how about introducing a SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_MEMFUNC() variant on x86 in a
suitable header, which maps to the right thing, with a comment added that
explains that this is for UML's mem*() functions?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists