[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca9075db-de92-4545-8c47-d6c292d57ad9@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:52:53 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: typec: tps6598x: add reset gpio support
On 15/09/2023 07:50, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The TPS6598x PD controller provides an active-high hardware reset input
> that reinitializes all device settings. If it is not grounded by
> design, the driver must be able to de-assert it in order to initialize
> the device.
>
> The PD controller is not ready for registration right after the reset
> de-assertion and a delay must be introduced in that case. According to
> TI, the delay can reach up to 1000 ms [1], which is in line with the
> experimental results obtained with a TPS65987D.
>
> Add a GPIO descriptor for the reset signal and basic reset management
> for initialization and suspend/resume.
>
> [1] https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/
> f/power-management-forum/1269856/tps65987d-tps65987d-reset-de-assert-
> to-normal-operation/4809389#4809389
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> index 37b56ce75f39..550f5913e985 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/power_supply.h>
> @@ -43,6 +44,9 @@
> /* TPS_REG_SYSTEM_CONF bits */
> #define TPS_SYSCONF_PORTINFO(c) ((c) & 7)
>
> +/* reset de-assertion to ready for operation */
> +#define SETUP_MS 1000
> +
> enum {
> TPS_PORTINFO_SINK,
> TPS_PORTINFO_SINK_ACCESSORY,
> @@ -86,6 +90,7 @@ struct tps6598x {
> struct mutex lock; /* device lock */
> u8 i2c_protocol:1;
>
> + struct gpio_desc *reset;
> struct typec_port *port;
> struct typec_partner *partner;
> struct usb_pd_identity partner_identity;
> @@ -717,6 +722,13 @@ static int tps6598x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> mutex_init(&tps->lock);
> tps->dev = &client->dev;
>
> + tps->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(tps->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(tps->reset))
> + return dev_err_probe(tps->dev, PTR_ERR(tps->reset),
> + "failed to get reset GPIO\n");
> + if (tps->reset)
> + msleep(SETUP_MS);
> +
This looks a bit odd to me, shouldn't you drive reset to zero ?
if (tps->reset) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tps->reset, 0);
msleep(SETUP_MS);
}
also wouldn't it make sense to functionally decompose that and reuse in
probe() and tps6598x_resume() ?
tps6598x_reset() {
if (tps->reset) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tps->reset, 0);
msleep(SETUP_MS);
}
}
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists