[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230915115631.GAZQRGb0vCmEnUcaZI@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:56:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@....com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
smita.koralahallichannabasappa@....com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, rric@...nel.org,
james.morse@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "EDAC/mce_amd: Do not load edac_mce_amd module on
guests"
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> Indeed. At what point is the lack of information and response long
> enough to simply commit a revert due to those lacks?
At no point.
> Even with the commit message having been rewritten and the link to:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210628172740.245689-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com
> added, this still reads as roughly:
>
> "A hypothetical bug on a hypothetivisor"
If "Hypervisors likely do not expose the SMCA feature to the guest"
doesn't explain to you what the problem is this commit is fixing, then
I can't help you.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists