linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 5/5] vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230915121452.87192-6-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:14:52 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, oxffffaa@...il.com,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/5] vsock/test: track bytes in MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET

The test was a bit complicated to read.
Added variables to keep track of the bytes read and to be read
in each step. Also some comments.

The test is unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index b18acbaf92e2..5743dcae2350 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -1002,6 +1002,7 @@ static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 
 static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 {
+	size_t read = 0, to_read;
 	unsigned char buf[64];
 	int fd;
 
@@ -1014,14 +1015,21 @@ static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	control_expectln("SEND0");
 
 	/* Read skbuff partially. */
-	recv_buf(fd, buf, 2, 0, 2);
+	to_read = 2;
+	recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, 0, to_read);
+	read += to_read;
 
 	control_writeln("REPLY0");
 	control_expectln("SEND1");
 
-	recv_buf(fd, buf + 2, 8, 0, 8);
+	/* Read the rest of both buffers */
+	to_read = strlen(HELLO_STR WORLD_STR) - read;
+	recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, 0, to_read);
+	read += to_read;
 
-	recv_buf(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 8 - 2, MSG_DONTWAIT, -EAGAIN);
+	/* No more bytes should be there */
+	to_read = sizeof(buf) - read;
+	recv_buf(fd, buf + read, to_read, MSG_DONTWAIT, -EAGAIN);
 
 	if (memcmp(buf, HELLO_STR WORLD_STR, strlen(HELLO_STR WORLD_STR))) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "pattern mismatch\n");
-- 
2.41.0