[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cyyj1s40.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:30:23 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] treewide: Use clocksource id for struct
system_counterval_t
Peter!
On Fri, Aug 18 2023 at 03:12, Peter Hilber wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@ struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(u64 art)
> res += tmp + art_to_tsc_offset;
>
> return (struct system_counterval_t) {
> - .cs = have_art ? &clocksource_tsc : NULL,
> + .cs_id = have_art ? CSID_TSC : CSID_GENERIC,
> .cycles = res
Can you please change all of this so that:
patch 1: Adds cs_id to struct system_counterval_t
patch 2-4: Add the clocksource ID and set the cs_id field
patch 5: Switches the core to evaluate cs_id
patch 6: Remove the cs field from system_counterval_t
> --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> @@ -270,12 +270,12 @@ struct system_device_crosststamp {
> * struct system_counterval_t - system counter value with the pointer to the
> * corresponding clocksource
> * @cycles: System counter value
> - * @cs: Clocksource corresponding to system counter value. Used by
> + * @cs_id: Clocksource corresponding to system counter value. Used by
> * timekeeping code to verify comparibility of two cycle values
That comment is inaccurate. It's not longer the clocksource itself. It's
the ID which is used for validation.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists