[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQRg89X67vKL8Q4d@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:49:39 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap: convert __page_check_anon_rmap() to folio
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 06:17:31PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> @@ -1176,8 +1175,8 @@ static void __page_check_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
> */
> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_anon_vma(folio)->root != vma->anon_vma->root,
> folio);
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_to_pgoff(page) != linear_page_index(vma, address),
> - page);
> + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_pgoff(folio) != linear_page_index(vma, address),
> + folio);
No, this is not equivalent. You haven't hit any problems testing it
because you don't have large anonymous folios.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists