lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1c8d747-dcf6-a913-f6d5-37fdfe3e2be6@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Sep 2023 23:16:26 +0400
From:   Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
To:     Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: ALSA: fix warnings in 'test-pcmtest-driver'

On 9/16/23 22:25, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> Removing an unused variable is actually removing a blank line from a
> logical point of view. Is an extra patch not overkill considering that
> it cannot affect the code behavior?

Well, no, it is not, as the line is not blank (nothing except removing a 
blank line could be considered as blank line removal) :) And an extra 
patch is not an overkill in case if you are separating logical changes.

However, rules may vary from one subsystem to another, so it is up to 
Shuah to decide take this patch or not. My opinion is that such changes 
should be separated into different patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ