linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tty v1 29/74] serial: imx: Use port lock wrappers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230917121154.q3qopymscpodaago@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:11:54 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty v1 29/74] serial: imx: Use port lock wrappers

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 09:51:40PM +0206, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2023-09-15, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >> Converted with coccinelle. No functional change.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > This lacks a Signed-off line by John.
> 
> I really didn't have anything to do with the development of this
> series. (I just did basic testing and the posting to LKML.) But I have
> no problems adding my SoB if that is more appropriate.

If you sent it, you have enough to do with it, that your S-o-b is
required. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for the
details, which has for example:

	Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the
	developer submitting the patch.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)