[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <384eb2c7-5aff-ef50-2f89-81cf8dd6e724@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:30:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Abdel Alkuor <alkuor@...il.com>, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
abdelalkuor@...tab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] dt-bindings: usb: tps6598x: Add tps25750
On 17/09/2023 17:26, Abdel Alkuor wrote:
> From: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@...tab.com>
>
> TPS25750 is USB TypeC PD controller which is a subset of TPS6598x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@...tab.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> index 5497a60cddbc..e49bd92b5276 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ properties:
> enum:
> - ti,tps6598x
> - apple,cd321x
> + - ti,tps25750
> +
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
>
> @@ -32,10 +34,45 @@ properties:
> items:
> - const: irq
>
> + firmware-name:
> + description: |
> + Should contain the name of the default patch binary
> + file located on the firmware search path which is
> + used to switch the controller into APP mode.
> + This is used when tps25750 doesn't have an EEPROM
> + connected to it.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + ti,patch-address:
> + description: |
> + One of PBMs command data field is I2C slave address
> + which is used when writing the patch for TPS25750.
> + The slave address can be any value except 0x00, 0x20,
> + 0x21, 0x22, and 0x23
Why this cannot be another entry in the reg?
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8
> + minimum: 1
> + maximum: 0x7e
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
>
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: ti,tps25750
> + then:
> + required:
> + - ti,patch-address
> + - connector
Why? Connector should be required or not required for both devices. What
is different between them?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists