linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] vlynq: remove bus support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19db0278-b11d-49f3-819b-cbc998769832@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:33:47 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] vlynq: remove bus support

On 9/18/23 06:18, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>> Agreed, TI AR7 is nearly 25 years old now, we should be able to remove that.
>> Wolfram, do you feel like doing that or would you rather have me do it, say
>> next week?
> 
> So, I pushed out an RC here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git renesas/cleanup/remove_ar7
> 
> Just waiting for the buildbot report before I send out patches. buildbot
> was already happy with my protoype, though. But I needed to reorder the
> patches. (I do wonder, though, if they build AR7. I would have expected
> a build failure with my prototype).

Looks good to me, just a few nits:

arch/arm/configs/pxa_defconfig:CONFIG_MTD_AR7_PARTS=m

this is clearly a stray reference to begin with, but should be folded in 
your commit removing the MTD partition parser.

Other than that, LGTM and thanks for doing that clean up.
-- 
Florian