[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87led3xqye.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:43:21 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@....com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
brett.creeley@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vfio] vfio/pci: remove msi domain on msi disable
On Mon, Sep 18 2023 at 11:17, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:14:06PM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> The new MSI dynamic allocation machinery is great for making the irq
>> management more flexible. It includes caching information about the
>> MSI domain which gets reused on each new open of a VFIO fd. However,
>> this causes an issue when the underlying hardware has flexible MSI-x
>> configurations, as a changed configuration doesn't get seen between
>> new opens, and is only refreshed between PCI unbind/bind cycles.
>>
>> In our device we can change the per-VF MSI-x resource allocation
>> without the need for rebooting or function reset. For example,
>>
>> 1. Initial power up and kernel boot:
>> # lspci -s 2e:00.1 -vv | grep MSI-X
>> Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=8 Masked-
>>
>> 2. Device VF configuration change happens with no reset
>
> Is this an out of tree driver problem?
>
> The intree way to alter the MSI configuration is via
> sriov_set_msix_vec_count, and there is only one in-tree driver that
> uses it right now.
Right, but that only addresses the driver specific issues.
> If something is going wrong here it should be fixed in the
> sriov_set_msix_vec_count() machinery, possibly in the pci core to
> synchronize the msi_domain view of the world.
Right, we should definitely not do that on a per driver basis.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists