linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.6-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ca3ac950-db89-426e-b5af-9f8bf5f91658@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:20:35 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.6-rc2

On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Another week, another -rc.
> 
[ ... ]
> 
> Please go test,
> 

No significant change / improvement since last week.

Build results:
	total: 157 pass: 151 fail: 6
Failed builds:
	alpha:allmodconfig
	csky:allmodconfig
	m68k:allmodconfig
	openrisc:allmodconfig
	parisc:allmodconfig
	s390:allmodconfig
Qemu test results:
	total: 530 pass: 530 fail: 0

Same build errors, same warnings as with 6.6-rc1.

Well, that is not entirely true. I do see a bunch of warnings in folio
code, such as

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 774 at include/linux/backing-dev.h:252 __folio_mark_dirty+0x318/0x350

but that is because I started testing gfs2 which always had that problem.
I am not sure if it is even worth reporting it. I did send a note to
the gfs2 mailing list and maintainers, and I won't mention it here again.

My list of pending fixes includes the following three patches.

LoongArch: Fix lockdep static memory detection
mfd: cs42l43: Use correct macro for new-style PM runtime ops
ASoC: wm8960: Fix error handling in probe

Guenter