[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51f76d81-77f7-48b0-7a94-b28b2e5ed868@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:12:49 +0800
From: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
<feng.tang@...el.com>, <damon@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: Fix memory leak in
damon_new_ctx()
On 2023/9/18 13:43, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Jinjie,
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:10:44 +0800 Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> The damon_ctx which is allocated by kzalloc() in damon_new_ctx() in
>> damon_test_ops_registration() and damon_test_set_attrs() are not freed and
>> it causes below memory leak. So use damon_destroy_ctx() to free it.
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c6968800 (size 512):
>> comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 350, jiffies 4294895294 (age 557.028s)
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> 00 87 93 03 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> backtrace:
>> [<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
>> [<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
>> [<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
>> [<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4
>> [<00000000daf6227b>] damon_test_ops_registration+0x34/0x328
>> [<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
>> [<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
>> [<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130
>> [<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c1a9cc00 (size 512):
>> comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 356, jiffies 4294895306 (age 557.000s)
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>> backtrace:
>> [<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
>> [<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
>> [<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
>> [<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4
>> [<00000000058495c4>] damon_test_set_attrs+0x30/0x1a8
>> [<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
>> [<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
>> [<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130
>> [<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
> Same to the comment on the first patch of this patchset, simply letting others
> know the name of the tool you used for making this cool output could be
> helpful. Could you please add it?
>
> Also, I prefer adding four spaces indent to quoted command outputs on commit
> messages. Could you please add that indentation?
>
> Also, I cannot 'git am' this patch on top of mm-unstable[1]. Could you please
> double check and rebase on latest mm-unstable if I din't miss something?
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/log/?h=mm-unstable
Sure. Thank you very much!
>
>>
>> Fixes: d1836a3b2a9a ("mm/damon/core-test: initialise context before test in damon_test_set_attrs()")
>> Fixes: 4f540f5ab4f2 ("mm/damon/core-test: add a kunit test case for ops registration")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/damon/core-test.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
>> index 255f8c925c00..ce86ed30fb47 100644
>> --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
>> +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
>> @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static void damon_test_ops_registration(struct kunit *test)
>>
>> /* Check double-registration failure again */
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_register_ops(&ops), -EINVAL);
>> +
>> + damon_destroy_ctx(c);
>> }
>>
>> static void damon_test_set_regions(struct kunit *test)
>> @@ -342,6 +344,8 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
>> invalid_attrs = valid_attrs;
>> invalid_attrs.aggr_interval = 4999;
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
>> +
>> + damon_destroy_ctx(c);
>> }
>>
>> static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
>
> Other than above comments, changes look good to me.
>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists