lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023091850-fever-nintendo-a2b6@gregkh>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:13:47 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Edward AD <eadavis@...a.com>
Cc:     jirislaby@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+b5d1f455d385b2c7da3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: fix memory leak in gsm_activate_mux

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:45:26PM +0800, Edward AD wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:06:58 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > When the call to gsm_register_devices() fails, we need to reclaim the memory
> > > requested in gsm_dlci_alloc().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 01aecd917114 ("tty: n_gsm: fix tty registration before control channel open")
> > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b5d1f455d385b2c7da3c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Edward AD <eadavis@...a.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > This message never made it to lore.kernel.org, so you might need to fix
> > up your email system so that it doesn't get dropped from there.
> This matter has been bothering me all along. I don't know why, some of the 
> patch emails I sent can be quickly responded to by "lore. kernel. org" correctly, 
> while others cannot. It wasn't until someone like you replied that I could see the 
> patches I sent.
> > 
> > Can you do so and resend?
> Yes, I can.
> However, it may take a long time as I currently do not know how to set up my email 
> system to avoid such issues from occurring.

Look at the tool `patatt`, it's what we use in `b4` to verify emails are
correct and sent by whom they say they are sent by.

Yours fail the checks by that tool, so try sending yourself an email and
work from there.

good luck!

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ