[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6447ab02-1a22-efe4-68c9-4f595e2499fc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:10:35 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>, kernel-team@...com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...riel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/ksm: add "smart" page scanning mode
On 12.09.23 19:52, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This change adds a "smart" page scanning mode for KSM. So far all the
> candidate pages are continuously scanned to find candidates for
> de-duplication. There are a considerably number of pages that cannot be
> de-duplicated. This is costly in terms of CPU. By using smart scanning
> considerable CPU savings can be achieved.
>
> This change takes the history of scanning pages into account and skips
> the page scanning of certain pages for a while if de-deduplication for
> this page has not been successful in the past.
>
> To do this it introduces two new fields in the ksm_rmap_item structure:
> age and skip_age. age, is the KSM age and skip_page is the age for how
> long page scanning of this page is skipped. The age field is incremented
> each time the page is scanned and the page cannot be de-duplicated.
>
> How often a page is skipped is dependent how often de-duplication has
> been tried so far and the number of skips is currently limited to 8.
> This value has shown to be effective with different workloads.
>
> The feature is currently disable by default and can be enabled with the
> new smart_scan knob.
>
> The feature has shown to be very effective: upt to 25% of the page scans
> can be eliminated; the pages_to_scan rate can be reduced by 40 - 50% and
> a similar de-duplication rate can be maintained.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>
> ---
> mm/ksm.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 981af9c72e7a..bfd5087c7d5a 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
> #define DO_NUMA(x) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +typedef u8 rmap_age_t;
> +
> /**
> * DOC: Overview
> *
> @@ -193,6 +195,8 @@ struct ksm_stable_node {
> * @node: rb node of this rmap_item in the unstable tree
> * @head: pointer to stable_node heading this list in the stable tree
> * @hlist: link into hlist of rmap_items hanging off that stable_node
> + * @age: number of scan iterations since creation
> + * @skip_age: skip rmap item until age reaches skip_age
> */
> struct ksm_rmap_item {
> struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_list;
> @@ -212,6 +216,8 @@ struct ksm_rmap_item {
> struct hlist_node hlist;
> };
> };
> + rmap_age_t age;
> + rmap_age_t skip_age;
> };
>
> #define SEQNR_MASK 0x0ff /* low bits of unstable tree seqnr */
> @@ -281,6 +287,9 @@ static unsigned int zero_checksum __read_mostly;
> /* Whether to merge empty (zeroed) pages with actual zero pages */
> static bool ksm_use_zero_pages __read_mostly;
>
> +/* Skip pages that couldn't be de-duplicated previously */
> +static bool ksm_smart_scan;
> +
> /* The number of zero pages which is placed by KSM */
> unsigned long ksm_zero_pages;
>
> @@ -2305,6 +2314,45 @@ static struct ksm_rmap_item *get_next_rmap_item(struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot,
> return rmap_item;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int inc_skip_age(rmap_age_t age)
> +{
> + if (age <= 3)
> + return 1;
> + if (age <= 5)
> + return 2;
> + if (age <= 8)
> + return 4;
> +
> + return 8;
> +}
> +
> +static bool skip_rmap_item(struct page *page, struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item)
> +{
> + rmap_age_t age;
> +
> + if (!ksm_smart_scan)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (PageKsm(page))
> + return false;
I'm a bit confused about this check here. scan_get_next_rmap_item()
would return a PageKsm() page and call cmp_and_merge_page().
cmp_and_merge_page() says: "first see if page can be merged into the
stable tree"
... but shouldn't a PageKsm page *already* be in the stable tree?
Maybe that's what cmp_and_merge_page() does via:
kpage = stable_tree_search(page);
if (kpage == page && rmap_item->head == stable_node) {
put_page(kpage);
return;
}
Hoping you can enlighten me :)
> +
> + age = rmap_item->age++;
Can't we overflow here? Is that desired, or would you want to stop at
the maximum you can store?
> + if (age < 3)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (rmap_item->skip_age == age) {
> + rmap_item->skip_age = 0;
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (rmap_item->skip_age == 0) {
> + rmap_item->skip_age = age + inc_skip_age(age);
Can't you overflow here as well?
> + remove_rmap_item_from_tree(rmap_item);
Can you enlighten me why that is required?
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists