[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230918120951.2230468-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:09:51 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: <sj@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
<damon@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: Fix memory leak in damon_new_ctx()
When CONFIG_DAMON_KUNIT_TEST=y and making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
and CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected.
The damon_ctx which is allocated by kzalloc() in damon_new_ctx() in
damon_test_ops_registration() and damon_test_set_attrs() are not freed.
So use damon_destroy_ctx() to free it. After applying this patch, the
following memory leak is never detected
unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c6968800 (size 512):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 350, jiffies 4294895294 (age 557.028s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 87 93 03 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
[<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
[<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
[<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4
[<00000000daf6227b>] damon_test_ops_registration+0x34/0x328
[<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
[<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
[<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130
[<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff2b49c1a9cc00 (size 512):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 356, jiffies 4294895306 (age 557.000s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
88 13 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 86 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000088e71769>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368
[<0000000073acab3b>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290
[<00000000b5f89cef>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x164
[<00000000eb19e83f>] damon_new_ctx+0x28/0xb4
[<00000000058495c4>] damon_test_set_attrs+0x30/0x1a8
[<00000000559c4801>] kunit_try_run_case+0x50/0xac
[<000000003932ed49>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x20/0x2c
[<000000003c3e9211>] kthread+0x124/0x130
[<0000000028f85bdd>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Fixes: d1836a3b2a9a ("mm/damon/core-test: initialise context before test in damon_test_set_attrs()")
Fixes: 4f540f5ab4f2 ("mm/damon/core-test: add a kunit test case for ops registration")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
v3:
- Add a new Reviewed-by.
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Rebased on mm-unstable.
- Update the commit message.
---
mm/damon/core-test.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
index 28d24e698318..b2a388ee062d 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void damon_test_ops_registration(struct kunit *test)
/* Check double-registration failure again */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_register_ops(&ops), -EINVAL);
+
+ damon_destroy_ctx(c);
}
static void damon_test_set_regions(struct kunit *test)
@@ -341,6 +343,8 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
invalid_attrs = valid_attrs;
invalid_attrs.aggr_interval = 4999;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
+
+ damon_destroy_ctx(c);
}
static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists